"I dunno, the enthusiasm wasn't there."
"Has the skills. Not sure if he has the hunger."
"He just didn't seem excited enough at the prospect of working here."
I'll be honest - that mode of thinking is alien to me. I understand why the owner of a company would think his company is special, the same way the mother of the ugliest child on Earth would think her tyke was Heaven-sent. My question really is: why should others be expected to feel the same way?
![]() |
| A face only a mother could love. |
Why, pray tell, should anyone, much less a fully qualified tech worker, be excited to be working for your company in particular? Is this really a reasonable expectation? Are you genuinely at the level where being allowed to work for you should be taken as an honor? What loses me is when people start giving themselves airs. Buddy, your company sells spaghetti and cheese fries. That's perfectly respectable. But stop talking about your "sacred mission" like you're solving world hunger.
What they probably really wanted
I suspect what they really meant was - we don't want people to just show up for the money and give the bare minimum. Which sounds more reasonable and actually even sympathetic.They probably also meant that they don't want this thing to be too transactional. But here's the thing, cupcake - it's all transactional. You're literally running a business here. People need money to pay their bills. They need jobs to have that money. You're offering a job - look, I don't really need to explain this part, do I?
And let's just quit sugarcoating it: Many of the employers who are fetishizing "hunger" can't handle genuine hunger. That level of hunger involves going above and beyond, yes. It also involves constantly looking out for the next better opportunity and coldly leaving their former employer in the dust if needs must. How do I know this? Well, I was young and dumb once. And yes, I was hungry. Starving, even. My employers were happy to benefit from my hunger, as they should. They were less happy when I left, and my hunger started benefitting other employers.
![]() |
| Here, eat some shit. |
No, an alarming number of the employers who say they want "hunger" and "enthusiasm", generally mean that they want someone more exploitable. Someone who will eat shit, smile, and thank their employer for the opportunity to eat shit.
Now, making some grandstanding claim about how exploitation is morally wrong, would make me a huge hypocrite. All my professional life, I have been exploiting my employers' need for labor and tech expertise, the same way they've been exploiting my need for money. It's mere capitalism; very mutual, very respectable.
I just wish people would be honest about what they want, instead of abusing the thesaurus for fancy terms like "hunger", "grit", "self-starter", "go-getter" and the usual cringe LinkedIn buzzwords. Employers, employees; we're on different sides of the chessboard but we're essentially playing the same game. No need to get all self-righteous about it.
The case against enthusiasm
If I wanted to be crude (or compare myself to a sex worker), employers like that remind me of a line I heard in a movie once, and for the life of me I can't remember which one, or even who said it. Was it Al Pacino? I'm certainly hearing it in Pacino's voice, specifically the one he used in The Devil's Advocate. He was talking about how ridiculous a guy was because he hired the services of a hooker and actually expected her to enjoy the sex. Basically, not only did the unfortunate woman have to blow him, she had to pretend it tasted like candy.![]() |
| Just like candy. |
These employers not only want their employees to run through brick walls for them, they want these employees to act like they've been given the highest privilege. Come on, now. Are you grateful that your employees choose to work here? If not, why should the reverse be true? I'm not even asking for humility here; that might be a step too far. Perhaps something more manageable, like dialling that hubris down to less cartoonish levels.
Do I have that requisite level of bright-eyed enthusiasm? Is that why I've been in this company for the last five years? Hell no, it's just the way I work. And that's exactly my point. Asking someone to be in the company out of "enthusiasm" is like asking someone to marry you purely for "love". All these are feelings. And feelings in human beings are even less predictable than an LLM's responses.
Nothing wrong with feelings either, but at some point you're going to need something more concrete and dare I say, sustainable.
What you want is work ethic. Something that persists regardless of a worker's feelings. After all, you don't pay for their feelings. You pay for their time, and their output.
The Takeaway
Any idiot can demand enthusiasm. And any idiot can fake it.It's not wrong to ask for enthusiasm. But you need to know what part this enthusiasm is supposed to play. "Enthusiasm" is a fuzzy metric that too many employers use to identify employees whom they can subsequently exploit.
Hunger cuts both ways. If you want anything less, you don't want "hungry". You want a
Stay hungry, but stop being foolish!
T___T
T___T



























































